[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lwip-devel] [PATCH] PPPoE: Fix build when PPPOE_TODO is defined
From: |
Sylvain Rochet |
Subject: |
Re: [lwip-devel] [PATCH] PPPoE: Fix build when PPPOE_TODO is defined |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:35:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hello Jacob,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 09:48:41PM +0100, Jacob Kroon wrote:
> ---
> src/include/netif/ppp/pppoe.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/include/netif/ppp/pppoe.h b/src/include/netif/ppp/pppoe.h
> index 08ab7ab5..3c41445c 100644
> --- a/src/include/netif/ppp/pppoe.h
> +++ b/src/include/netif/ppp/pppoe.h
> @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ struct pppoe_softc {
> u8_t sc_state; /* discovery phase or session connected */
>
> #ifdef PPPOE_TODO
> - u8_t *sc_service_name; /* if != NULL: requested name of service */
> - u8_t *sc_concentrator_name; /* if != NULL: requested concentrator id */
> + char *sc_service_name; /* if != NULL: requested name of service */
> + char *sc_concentrator_name; /* if != NULL: requested concentrator id */
> #endif /* PPPOE_TODO */
> u8_t sc_ac_cookie[PPPOE_MAX_AC_COOKIE_LEN]; /* content of AC cookie we
> must echo back */
> u8_t sc_ac_cookie_len; /* length of cookie data */
> --
> 2.11.0
Thanks for your patch but I feel confused. I have no clue at all what
you are trying to achieve and the patch description is unfortunately
empty.
What is the actual fix ? Why do you care about service name and
concentrator name support ? Is this enough for the feature to work ?
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature