[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Rocky Bernstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:23:27 -0500 |
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:12 PM Thomas Schmitt <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Edd Barret wrote:
> > If you send me the URL to your git repo
>
> I don't have a remote git repo of my own. Only access to some that are
> maintained by others.
> In general i suspect that git is smarter than me.
>
>
> > I guess you can use a similar strategy to get my libcdio changes into a
> > branch on savannah.
>
> Rocky once forced libcdio commit permissions on me. (Frightening.)
>
I assume that was a typo for Delighting
<https://www.dictionary.com/browse/delighting>.
So i will take care of my change in gnu_linux.c.
>
> Merging your branch with libcdio is up to Rocky.
>
> About libcdio-paranoia i would rather propose that you maintain the branch
> that will be candidate for merging. For now my only contribution is
> spotting two non-fatal quirks, researching their background, and proposing
> the obvious fixes.
>
>
> > But please wait for me to review and re-organise the commits
> > in my branch
>
> No problem.
>
>
> > I can do final testing once we have the branches all but ready to merge.
>
> You should check whether the two predicted problems appear for you
> without my changes being applied to libcdio-paranoia.
>
> I saw after correction of the gnu_linux.c bug, when running cd-paranioa
> with option -v:
>
> 1: No tracks are reported underneath the headline
> "Table of contents (audio tracks only):"
>
> 2: The complaint
> "Cannot determine CDROM drive endianness."
> is reported under the headline
> "Attempting to determine drive endianness from data......"
>
> If all is correct on your system, then i do not understand my changes
> enough.
>
> If you see the problems, then i hope you are curious enough to try my
> change proposals.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, (continued)
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Rocky Bernstein <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/15
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/15
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/16
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/16
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/16
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/16