[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Edd Barrett |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Dec 2018 18:05:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 06:02:31PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> At least the bug about the potentially wrong track number interpretation
> in get_track_msf_netbsd() and get_track_format_netbsd() should be tackled.
> See my message
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libcdio-devel/2018-10/msg00025.html
I've finally found some time to look at this. The following diff seems
to work, although I don't think I have any CDs where the first track
number isn't 1 to test with.
https://github.com/vext01/libcdio/commit/d04c48e36e7bb810dede415950a8cdf69e625e0a
Looks good?
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/03
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09