[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Choosing the build platforms
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: Choosing the build platforms |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:42:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Eelco Dolstra <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/23/2011 03:18 PM, Rob Vermaas wrote:
>
>> However, my understanding is that the i386-sunos and i686-freebsd
>> machines at TU Delft are currently dead. Rob: can you confirm?
>>
>> Eelco has added replacements for them again as VMs, as well as for
>> 64 bit freebsd.
>
> Note that I renamed the "i386-sunos" platform type to "i686-solaris". The VM
> in
> question is actually an OpenIndiana machine (a fork of OpenSolaris).
Is there cpu/disk/memory enough to build more projects on it? If it is
not a burden, I'd like all projects that I'm interested to be built on
both the solaris/freebsd builders as well. Especially Solaris seems to
trigger a bunch of portability quirks.
/Simon
- libidn fix, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/21
- Re: libidn fix, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/21
- Re: libidn fix, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/22
- Re: libidn fix, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/22
- Re: libidn fix, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/22
- Choosing the build platforms, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/23
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Rob Vermaas, 2011/11/23
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Eelco Dolstra, 2011/11/23
- Re: Choosing the build platforms,
Simon Josefsson <=
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Eelco Dolstra, 2011/11/23
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/23
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Simon Josefsson, 2011/11/24
- Re: Choosing the build platforms, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/25