Re: Is there something like `file-name-concat', but for urls?

[Emanuel Berg]

tomas wrote:

>> BTW thanks for letting me realize I should modernize that,
>> it is so old https isn't even included [...]
>
> Plus URL encoding. Plus deciding in fringe cases whether
> encoding is in order or not [...]

How the URL can look is defined by a grammar, this is
Computer Science theory of Compiler Design. Because, if we get
the standard definition, expressed as a grammar, we can not
only use the correct terminology from there, we can also
verify if the result URL is valid or not.

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal