[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Aug 2021 21:41:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eduardo Ochs wrote:
> The two programming languages that I use more are Elisp and
> Lua, and Lua
They (the Brazilians) did Lua (moon in Portugese) because
Python wasn't around, and Lisp was too cryptic with its
"unfriendly" syntax :) [1]
> the easiest way to understand a specification that can be
> implemented in many ways is to study the specification AND
> one implementation of it.
ikr?
> details [...] of the current implementation of lexical
> binding in Emacs are hard to find, so I'm writing them
> myself
Okay, but how many situations are they?
You already have the example with `let', what other situations
can you think of?
One example per situation should be enough and do them as
short as possible. Because there aren't that many, are there?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lua_(programming_language)
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
RE: [External] : Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, Drew Adams, 2021/08/14
Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/14