[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?
From: |
Eduardo Ochs |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples? |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Aug 2021 13:15:26 -0300 |
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 at 10:36, Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> The advantages of lexical binding are easy to find, and all of them
> are true advantages, for both programming and program analysis. The
> advantages of dynamic binding are not so easy to find, but they're
> quite important to an environment such as that of Emacs.
>
> RMS gave good arguments _for Emacs_ (and similar, user-programmer
> environments) to support dynamic binding, here:
Hi Drew!
Fantastic! Thanks! =)
By the way, here's a package that installs SICP converted to info
format, for those (not Drew!) who don't know that this exists...
http://melpa.org/#/sicp
https://github.com/webframp/sicp-info
Cheers =),
Eduardo Ochs
http://angg.twu.net/#eev
- Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, (continued)
RE: [External] : Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, Drew Adams, 2021/08/14
- Re: [External] : Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?,
Eduardo Ochs <=
Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/14
Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, tomas, 2021/08/14
RE: [External] : Re: Lexical vs. dynamic: small examples?, Drew Adams, 2021/08/14