Re: Processed: control message for bug #33200

[Noam Postavsky]

.On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 15:49, Michael Albinus <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm not sure. "gnus" is used as second package beside "emacs", so it is
> simple to filter for gnus bugs in debbugs. A gnus bug report, at least
> when calling "M-x gnus-bug", adds the header "X-Debbugs-Package: emacs,gnus",
> which sounds OK to me. This was changed by Lars on Feb 7 2017, so I
> guess all Emacs versions since 26.1 behave so.

Oh, I missed that. Still not sure if it makes sense to have a separate
"gnus" package (considering many other ELPA packages don't have this
option), but as long the "emacs" package is used it doesn't really
hurt much I guess.

> > Yeah, I have in my .emacs.d an alternate function which just adds the
> > control commands to an email, so that the user can review before
> > sending. I will see about adding it to debbugs.el.
>
> Patches welcome!

https://debbugs.gnu.org/33225