[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving CoreBase into Base
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Moving CoreBase into Base |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 16:15:17 +0100 |
On 17 Sep 2010, at 10:11, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> However, I think it would be good to maintain clear separation ... with
> CoreBase being a subproject, and continuing to be built as a separate library
> (so not quite the same as the existing additions subproject, which is
> actually merged into the base library except on OSX where its a separate
> library used with Foundation).
That's exactly what I thought I was suggesting - sorry if it wasn't clear.
> You could have the gnustep-base package build and install both by default,
> but have an easy configure-time option to control exactly what gets
> built/installed.
Well, we'll need to install the CoreBase headers anyway if we want the string.h
and other stuff to be included by Foundation.h (as it is on OS X.
Nicola: I wonder if this alters the performance of precompiled headers - the
preprocessed Foundation.h header on OS X is significantly larger than with
GNUstep, in part because it includes all of this other stuff.
David
- Moving CoreBase into Base, Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/16
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Stef Bidi, 2010/09/16
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2010/09/17
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Fred Kiefer, 2010/09/18
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/18
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, David Chisnall, 2010/09/18
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Eric Wasylishen, 2010/09/18
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Gregory Casamento, 2010/09/18
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/19
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Fred Kiefer, 2010/09/20
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/21
- Re: Moving CoreBase into Base, Quentin Mathé, 2010/09/21