Re: Static analyser results for -base (277 potential bugs)

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 12 Sep 2010, at 00:35, David Chisnall wrote:

> I've now set up a jail that will check out the code each night and run the 
> static analyser.  You can find the results here:
> 
> http://gnustep.theravensnest.org/
> 
> Currently only the link to the results for -base works - it's in the process 
> of generating the ones for -gui and -back.

Is there some way to mark things so that all the cases where the analyser is 
known to be wrong (or is reporting something correctly, but the 'problem' is 
actually intended behavior) will no longer be reported?
It looks like there are so many false positives that it's hard to use this 
report.