gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results


From: Fred Kiefer
Subject: Re: [Gnustep-cvs] GNUstep Testfarm Results
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:56:25 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060725)

Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
> 
> On 14 Aug 2006, at 22:19, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> 
>> Adam Fedor schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
>>>> In the most recent GSString.m version these methods are there only
>>>> once.
>>>> The first one is obsolete anyway, see NSString, where it gets
>>>> defined as
>>>> calling the second one. As this in now the only remaining usage of
>>>> substring_c, we could try to do the inlining ourselves and put the code
>>>> from the function inside the method. If this alone does not resolve the
>>>> compilation issue, we could try to rework the actual code. Here the
>>>> interesting question could be why the similar which calls substring_u
>>>> works.
>>>
>>> No, both substring_c and substring_u have the problem Removing the
>>> inlining or moving the struct definition out of the function block
>>> solves the problem.
>>>
>>
>> Great, so now we have a solution. But I think it is better to leave the
>> actual implementation to Richard. He has been doing a lot of work in
>> this area recently and there may still be more to come. This change
>> looks simple, but it might interfere with something he is planing to do.
>>
>> Richard is it fine for you to do this change?
> 
> OK ..  no problem.
> 

Thank you! The last test went through successfully on all three platforms.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]