freetype
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft] Freetype x86


From: Semeriak, AleksandraX
Subject: Re: [ft] Freetype x86
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 15:32:55 +0000

Dear Werner,

My apologies for the late reply, the email was directed to the Junk E-Mail 
folder for some reason and I haven't seen it until now. 
Thank you very much for the provided information - our engineers are looking 
now into the possible difficulties and we will get back to you with a detailed 
feedback soon. 

Sincerely,

Aleksandra Semeriak
Intel Software Partner Program 
+44 3300088836
address@hidden
 aleksandra.semeriak.work

 Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Intel is committed to protecting your privacy. For more information about 
Intel's Privacy Notice, please visit www.intel.com/privacy 
or write Intel Corporation, ATTN Privacy, Mailstop RNB4-145, 2200 Mission 
College Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA.




-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Werner LEMBERG
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 11:31 PM
To: Semeriak, AleksandraX
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft] Freetype x86


Hello Aleksandra!


> We have come across several great Android apps that are taking 
> advantage of Freetype.  As far as I found out the Freetype does 
> support Android x86 platforms natively, although this option is not 
> set by default.

Basically, FreeType doesn't provide special support for *any* platform.  Or to 
formulate it differently, FreeType should run on
*any* platform that comes with an ANSI C compiler.  The normal configuration 
for compilation of our library uses the GNU autoconf framework, which should be 
able to correctly derive the used platform.
If that fails, there are various means to override the incorrect settings.

For some platforms, FreeType provides assembler routines for time-critical 
functions.  One of them is for i386, and I guess that this assembler code works 
on Android x86 also.

> We would like to know if there would be an interest from your side and 
> opportunity to make the x86 version the default version of Freetype.

Please be more specific.  What exactly are the problems?  Are there bug reports 
or similar things that we can analyze?


    Werner

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]