[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] Licence issues
From: |
Edward Lee |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] Licence issues |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 00:23:11 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002, Thibault Jamme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to release my project http://www.aptilis.com/ under the GPL licence,
> but I saw that Freetype 1 (the one I'm using) is covered by the BSD
> licencing scheme which appears incompatible.
>
> Does anyone know what the implications are? How to address them?
From FreeType-1.5 FAQ,
--- >8 ---
23. What does the `free' in FreeType really means?
The previous releases of FreeType (alphas and beta) were placed
under the LGPL. FreeType 1.0, and later releases, come with an an
alternate license, inspired from the BSD, Artistic, and IJG's
(Independent JPEG Group) ones. In short:
- You are encouraged to use and distribute this program in all
kinds of products, including commercial ones.
- You don't have to pay us anything for it (royalty-free).
- You may not pretend you wrote it, or part of it that you may use
in one of your product, and you have to state clearly that you
use the FreeType code if you distribute products based on it, or
parts of it (credits clause).
- This source code is provided AS IS, with no warranty whatsoever,
and we cannot promise support for it.
From version 1.5 and later releases, we added the choice for the
user of the library to use the GNU General Public License instead.
As a result, you can link the Freetype library with any GPL-ed
software, without any inconvenience; however, you then have the
obligation to publish all of the source code of the products you
release.
The exact and legal terms are in the files `docs/FTL.txt' and
`docs/GPL.txt', respectively.
Enjoy ;-)
--- 8< ---
FYI.
Rgds,
Edward G.J. Lee