Re: Start points of contours & rasterizer [was: Need help on dvi

[Tom Kacvinsky]

I do not have the problem with /x from eurm10 nor with /X from eusm10.  ftview
shows these glyphs properly.  I think that the problem you are having with /x
and /X has not much to do with the rasterizer, but rathter, something in your
code... :(

I am still looking into the /integraldisplay problem in CMEX10.  I am making
some progress there...

Tom

On Mon, 9 Oct 2000 address@hidden wrote:

> >In reply to Tom Kacvinsky <address@hidden>
> >>
> >>Well, I think I might be mistaken (go figure. me, wrong? ;).
> >>
> >>I have an OpenType version of CMEX10 that I made with Adobe's OT FDK.  When 
> >>I
> >>disassemble the CFF table, I see that the start point of /integraldisplay is
> >>exactly the same as the start point in the Type 1 PFA/PFB.  Yet the CFF 
> >>version
> >>of the font views properly with ftview, and the Type 1 version does not.
> >>Weird...
> >>
> >>Tom
> >>
> >
> >but wait, there's more!
> >
> >glyph 120 from eurm10.pfb (a small and innocent looking "x")
> >
> >also breaks my code
> 
> and glyph 88 from eusm10...
> 
> --
> Cesar Augusto Rorato Crusius    __o      __o      __o      __o      __o    
> Stanford University           _`\<,    _`\<,    _`\<,    _`\<,    _`\<,    
> e-mail:address@hidden    (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)   
> www.stanford.edu/~crusius
>                                        o      _     _         _
>    __o      __o      __o      __o     /\_   _ \\o  (_)\__/o  (_)
>  _`\<,    _`\<,    _`\<,    _`\<,    _>(_) (_)/<_    \_| \   _|/' \/
> (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)/(_)  (_)        (_)   (_)    (_)'  _\o_
> 
> He who sacrifices functionality for ease of use
> Loses both and deserves neither
>