freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with flagging font as 'tricky'


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with flagging font as 'tricky'
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:23:18 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1

Ahh... Werner, is it considerable idea for FreeType to add a hardwired 
assumption to recognize the randomization prefix of the fonts embedded in PDF?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

On 2021/02/12 17:31, Justyna Wawrzynska wrote:
Hi Werner,

Thank you for quick response. To be more precise, my case is PDLCJH+OCR-A font. 
This is incremental font build of OCR-A font. Free type flags it as tricky.

BR,

Justyna

-----Original Message-----
From: suzuki toshiya <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 2:06 AM
To: Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>; Justyna Wawrzynska 
<justyna.wawrzynska@bluecrestinc.com>; Roy Tam <roytam@gmail.com>
Cc: freetype-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with flagging font as 'tricky'

Dear Werner, Justyna and Roy,

"DLC" was introduced by the request from Mr. Roy Tam,

https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Ffreetype%2Ffreetype%2F-%2Fcommit%2F0ed9fef032641c30d0398d98a01b69eca1c15224__%3B!!GXa4NB5MBjHR!GhS45UM8ehm31_wdZY6W6qbgdu5gKwZRk5MJ738vZwccn05k2yyj_H-xn3c1sjyGMskkFKv2UNMC%24&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjustyna.wawrzynska%40bluecrestinc.com%7C7cda724ec08348f84e2b08d8cef26873%7C8310f036fe8d4702a1e0177e9320227c%7C0%7C0%7C637486887837571500%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=gnyl5InB9EGayRRkEtGJHTH3h1GFVohpDlEuqXtULQ8%3D&amp;reserved=0

The assumed font file*s* were dlctt-m7.ttf and dftt-f5.ttf. Revisiting the changeset, using 
"DLC" prefix in the deny list is slightly too greedy idea to catch all Dynalab fonts, I 
feel. Also it could be slightly odd to understand the situation as "2 different fonts produced 
by same company have same family name", because it means that the customer cannot use these 2 
fonts at the same time. Mr. Roy, do you have more detailed info to identify the fonts precisely?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

On 2021/02/12 1:44, Werner LEMBERG wrote:

Hello Justyna,


Before flagging the font as 'tricky' you are checking its name and
comparing it with the trick_names table defined in ttobjs.c file.
This causes that some fonts which aren't tricky are also flagged and
as a result we can't use autohinting on it.

What names are you talking about?

The main problem cause the fonts having prefixes in its names (like
incremental fonts) and "DLC" in the trick_names table.  Is there any
chance to change this method or even change the "DLC" to "DLCMing"
and "DLCFong"?

Certainly.  The more details you give on the font names you are going
to use (or which are already used by you), the finer we can adjust the
filter.


      Werner


This email message may contain confidential, proprietary and/or privileged 
information. It is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If 
you have received it in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply 
email and then delete this message. No one other than the intended recipient 
may disclose, copy, distribute or use the information contained in this message.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]