Re: [DotGNU]Re: [Introspector-developers] RE: Call for a DotGNU/W3C RDF API (was Re:GPL relicense for Eule r (was Re: call for alpha testers EulerSharp for dotgnu/pnet))

[Gopal V]

If memory serves me right, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> Gopal V. and I have been discussing making a super fast version of
> Euler that uses the native il stack, I am not very good at optimizations, 

The idea we have been discussing is to convert the stack push/pop stuff
into a set of IL instructions instead of using an artificial stack ...
And build a sort of compiler for the rules to IL .

The regular expressions libs is the only place in the Portable.net 
framework where we might use this strategy. But it's equally applicable
to Euler as long as the stack is the major bottleneck . It's a lot faster
this way as IL is inherently a stack machine.

> > i'll try to attend the morning session if possible
> > i've done part of the alphatesting with the latest
> >
> http://introspector.sourceforge.net/debian/incoming/eulersharp_0.1-1.tar.gz
> > while using
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/dotgnu-pnet/pnet-0.5.2.tar.gz
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/dotgnu-pnet/pnetlib-0.5.2.tar.gz
> > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/dotgnu-pnet/treecc-0.2.2.tar.gz
> > and haven't found any major issues yet
> > but am deeply impressed about all that running code...

:-) ... I hope I can make it run faster ...

Motto : get it *running* fast, then get it running *fast* 

hmm.. could we focus the discussion back onto dotgnu.org lists ?.
I hate cross-posting ...

Gopal
-- 
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success