Re: [DotGNU](no subject)

[Gopal V]

If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
 
> I'll poke around in the ECMA spec and try to figure out what the rule is so 
> that "callvirt" can be fixed too.  There is a rule that "instance" should be 
> added automatically to method definition signatures, but this is a method 
> reference instead.  More care is needed for references.

Hmm... I thought we could use "callvirt" only on instance methods ? ...

(so if I get I_METHOD as callvirt, it should be ok to force the method def
 to instance callconv ?).

> not to confuse the poor boy Gopal. :-)

Sorry ... I should really stop rambling :)

Gopal
-- 
The difference between insanity and genius is measured by success