[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:06:09 +0000 |
Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency of my analysis: the considered
Nyquist
zone is during sampling, and not during decimation. Setting LO to 56.95 MHz
works
perfectly, thank you.
JM
--
JM Friedt, FEMTO-ST Time & Frequency/SENSeOR, 26 rue de l'Epitaphe,
25000 Besancon, France
July 20, 2020 5:43 PM, "Brian Padalino" <bpadalino@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 11:32 AM jean-michel.friedt@femto-st.fr
> <jean-michel.friedt@femto-st.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Indeed second Nyquist zone before decimation.
>> My thought was
>> 143.05 MHz -> transpose by 100 MHz using the DDC (NCO at 100 MHz considering
>> the
>> 200 MHz sampling rate) to reach 43.05, and after transposition, decimating
>> to reach
>> 8 MS/s (I do have Epcos B3607 SAW filters 140+/-3 MHz frontend to select
>> only the
>> signal I am interested in).
>> It is in the decimation process that I was thinking of being in the third
>> Nyquist zone after decimation, which is incorrect because 8 MS/s is -4 to
>> +4, so that
>> 43.05 is in the 6th Nyquist zone after decimation (\in[36:44] MHz).
>
> This seems weird.
>
> Sampling 143.05MHz at 200MHz real will produce the desired signal at 56.95MHz
> and conjugated, won't
> it? Since it's real, it'll appear at both positive and negative frequencies,
> with the negative
> component being conjugated.
> So if you mix with 56.95MHz, it will take the conjugated negative signal of
> the conjugated desired
> signal and mix it to 0Hz. Then you can go through the decimation filtering
> however you want and
> everything is centered at 0Hz.
>
> Right?
>
> Brian
- Home Radio Astronomy Installation Guide, Glen Langston, 2020/07/05
- Message not available
- aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, address@hidden, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, Marcus D. Leech, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, address@hidden, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, Marcus D. Leech, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, Brian Padalino, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, Marcus D. Leech, 2020/07/20
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?,
address@hidden <=
- Re: aliasing with X310 BasicRX (higher order Nyquist zone) ?, Marcus D. Leech, 2020/07/20