[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] Java interface progress update number 2
From: |
Andrej Pancik |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] Java interface progress update number 2 |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:39:54 +0100 |
Hello,
>> * RESIGN_FEDERATION_EXECUTION message's resign action in C++ code of
>> the RTI ambassador is never written or read. Is it all right?
>
> This is an unimplemented feature, should be considered as a bug
> for now, may be you can open a bug in the tracker for that?
I will do it right away.
>> * Similarly in UPDATE_ATTRIBUTE_VALUES message there is always
>> written boolean value TRUE ("req.setBoolean(true);") at the end of the
>> message. I am just curious what it is for?
>
> The boolean indicates if the message is timestamped or not.
> (this is illnamed and we should rename those when using Message Generator
> for the Message as we did for NetworkMessage).
>
> I'm pretty sure we do NOT always write TRUE.
>
> Which file/line number makes you think this is always the case?
I am sorry. It seems to be all right. I must have missed the correct
meaning when looking at the code.
regards
Andrej