bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > I suspect the best option in the above case is to inhibit the inner
>> > calls to before/after (assuming we're sure they change only the "new
>> > text"), so we'd be down to:
>> >
>> >     ⛔ Warning (emacs): Before: 1278 1281
>> >     ⛔ Warning (emacs): After: 1278 1288 delta: 7
>> 
>> A simpler option is the patch below.
>
> Doesn't that miss the changes done by upcase-region?

No: `upcase-region` runs its own `before/after-change-functions`
(indeed, these were the problematic nested ones which break the order).

> Also, what about point not being after the inserted replacement at
> that place?

`*-change-functions` can't rely on the position of point so that's not
an issue.


        Stefan