[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the sa
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#65451: 30.0.50; `after-change-functions' are not triggered in the same order the changes are made |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:47:38 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, 65451@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de
> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 11:38:24 -0400
>
> > I still stand by my opinion: Org is relying on something it cannot
> > rely upon, not as long as a function that changes a buffer can be
> > called from another function which changes the same buffer.
>
> `*-change-functions` should not modify the buffer
That's not what happened in the case described in that bug, AFAIR.
Simply a buffer change started, then, before it ended, another nested
change was started.
> so the only cases I can think of where "a function that changes a
> buffer can be called from another function which changes the same
> buffer" is when both of those functions are in our C code and we
> should have enough control to fix those cases.
You forget the various hooks, other than buffer modification hooks.
> Alan did convince me that we should treat them as bugs and that we
> should try and fix them.
He didn't convince me.