|
| From: | Dmitry Gutov |
| Subject: | bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Mar 2024 22:55:55 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 20/03/2024 21:01, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
* Maybe the :destructive keyword be called :inplace or :in-place instead? Shorter, less violent.
If the function default to destructive, perhaps the argument could be called :copy.
:in-place is not too bad. But I've looked around and don't see many sorting functions in other stdlibs that do it non-destructively.
Even 'sort' in Clojure might mutate: https://clojuredocs.org/clojure.core/sort
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |