[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate
From: |
Mattias Engdegård |
Subject: |
bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2024 15:56:23 +0100 |
10 mars 2024 kl. 15.09 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> A nit: let's go with a name that doesn't have "new" as part of it.
Sorry, that was meant as a placeholder. I should have used a more obvious
non-name.
> Do you intend to present an implementation that replaces sort-on as
> well?
Yes, `sort-on` would be completely subsumed by the new interface.
> And what about performance?
Existing code should see little or no change. Users of the new interface would
probably see performance improvements. You should trust me on neither of these
points until there is actual code.
However the performance of the universal predicate seems fine, and is
definitely better than hand-writing a predicate in Lisp when applicable.
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/10
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/10
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate,
Mattias Engdegård <=
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Eshel Yaron, 2024/03/21
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/03/22
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Dmitry Gutov, 2024/03/23
- bug#69709: `sort` interface improvement and universal ordering predicate, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/23