[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:43:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
>> >> >> +@defvar tabulated-list-groups
>> >> >> +This buffer-local variable specifies the groups of entries displayed
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> +the Tabulated List buffer. Its value should be either a list, or a
>> >> >> +function.
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +If the value is a list, each list element corresponds to one group,
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> +should have the form @w{@code{(@var{group-name} @var{entries})}},
>> >> >> where
>> >> >> +@var{group-name} is a string inserted before all group entries, and
>> >> >> +@var{entries} have the same format as @code{tabulated-list-entries}
>> >> >> +(see above).
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +Otherwise, the value should be a function which returns a list of the
>> >> >> +above form when called with no arguments.
>> >> >> +@end defvar
>> >> >
>> >> > I think the way to specify ENTRIES for this customization should be
>> >> > described in more detail. Reading the above description, even the
>> >> > idea of using ENTRIES for specifying grouping is unclear, since
>> >> > tabulated-list-entries is basically just a list of column descriptors.
>> >>
>> >> But ENTRIES are described in 'tabulated-list-entries'. Here ENTRIES
>> >> are no different from 'tabulated-list-entries' that are just
>> >> column descriptors.
>> >
>> > My point is that it isn't obvious how to describe grouping in terms of
>> > column descriptors. I think the manual should tell in more detail how
>> > to use column descriptors to specify how entries should be grouped.
>> > Maybe an example or two is all that it takes to do that.
>>
>> Sorry, I don't understand what is unclear here:
>>
>> If the value is a list, each list element corresponds to one group, and
>> should have the form @w{@code{(@var{group-name} @var{entries})}}, where
>> @var{group-name} is a string inserted before all group entries, and
>> @var{entries} have the same format as @code{tabulated-list-entries}
>> (see above).
>>
>> Basically this says that the format is (group-name entries) where
>> entries are described in tabulated-list-entries as having the format
>> (id contents). There is no need to duplicate the description of entries.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something here. To put it more concretely, can you
> show a value of tabulated-list-groups that will cause the buffers in
> buffer list grouped by major mode using the above form?
Data structure for `tabulated-list-groups' is a list of elements,
each element should of the form
(GROUP-NAME (ID . CONTENTS) (ID . CONTENTS) ...)
where GROUP-NAME is the name of the group, ID is a Lisp object that
identifies the entry and CONTENTS is a vector with the same number of
elements as `tabulated-list-format'. When buffers grouped by major mode:
(("* Lisp Interaction" (#<buffer *scratch*> ["." " " "*" #("*scratch*" 0 9
...) "225" "Lisp Interaction" ""]) ...))
>> >> >> +(ert-deftest tabulated-list-groups ()
>> >> >> + (with-temp-buffer
>> >> >> + (tabulated-list-mode)
>> >> >> + (setq tabulated-list-groups
>> >> >> + (reverse
>> >> >> + (seq-group-by (lambda (b) (concat "* " (aref (cadr b) 3)))
>> >> >> + tabulated-list--test-entries)))
>> >> >> + (setq tabulated-list-format tabulated-list--test-format)
>> >> >> + (setq tabulated-list-padding 7)
>> >> >> + (tabulated-list-init-header)
>> >> >> + (tabulated-list-print)
>> >> >
>> >> > This seems to test only the function value of tabulated-list-groups?
>> >> > What about the other form of the value?
>> >>
>> >> The other forms have no functional difference.
>> >
>> > Sorry, I don't follow. Shouldn't we test the capability of specifying
>> > grouping by the method other than by providing a function?
>>
>> Actually there are no other methods.
>
> The doc string says the "value can be either a list or a function". I
> see only one value here, so I'm asking what about a value of the other
> form. Or what am I missing here?
Another form is a function. But there is no need to test this.
It's just a copy from tabulated-list-entries that is unused.
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/21
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/21
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/22
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/22
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/22
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/22
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/23
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/23
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode,
Juri Linkov <=
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/24
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/24
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Adam Porter, 2024/02/25
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/25
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/25
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/27
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/27
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/27
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/02/27
- bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode, Juri Linkov, 2024/02/28