bug#69305: outline-minor-mode for tabulated-list-mode

[Juri Linkov]

>> >> +@defvar tabulated-list-groups
>> >> +This buffer-local variable specifies the groups of entries displayed in
>> >> +the Tabulated List buffer.  Its value should be either a list, or a
>> >> +function.
>> >> +
>> >> +If the value is a list, each list element corresponds to one group, and
>> >> +should have the form @w{@code{(@var{group-name} @var{entries})}}, where
>> >> +@var{group-name} is a string inserted before all group entries, and
>> >> +@var{entries} have the same format as @code{tabulated-list-entries}
>> >> +(see above).
>> >> +
>> >> +Otherwise, the value should be a function which returns a list of the
>> >> +above form when called with no arguments.
>> >> +@end defvar
>> >
>> > I think the way to specify ENTRIES for this customization should be
>> > described in more detail.  Reading the above description, even the
>> > idea of using ENTRIES for specifying grouping is unclear, since
>> > tabulated-list-entries is basically just a list of column descriptors.
>>
>> But ENTRIES are described in 'tabulated-list-entries'.  Here ENTRIES
>> are no different from 'tabulated-list-entries' that are just
>> column descriptors.
>
> My point is that it isn't obvious how to describe grouping in terms of
> column descriptors.  I think the manual should tell in more detail how
> to use column descriptors to specify how entries should be grouped.
> Maybe an example or two is all that it takes to do that.

Sorry, I don't understand what is unclear here:

  If the value is a list, each list element corresponds to one group, and
  should have the form @w{@code{(@var{group-name} @var{entries})}}, where
  @var{group-name} is a string inserted before all group entries, and
  @var{entries} have the same format as @code{tabulated-list-entries}
  (see above).

Basically this says that the format is (group-name entries) where
entries are described in tabulated-list-entries as having the format
(id contents).  There is no need to duplicate the description of entries.

>> >> +(ert-deftest tabulated-list-groups ()
>> >> +  (with-temp-buffer
>> >> +    (tabulated-list-mode)
>> >> +    (setq tabulated-list-groups
>> >> +          (reverse
>> >> +           (seq-group-by (lambda (b) (concat "* " (aref (cadr b) 3)))
>> >> +                         tabulated-list--test-entries)))
>> >> +    (setq tabulated-list-format tabulated-list--test-format)
>> >> +    (setq tabulated-list-padding 7)
>> >> +    (tabulated-list-init-header)
>> >> +    (tabulated-list-print)
>> >
>> > This seems to test only the function value of tabulated-list-groups?
>> > What about the other form of the value?
>>
>> The other forms have no functional difference.
>
> Sorry, I don't follow.  Shouldn't we test the capability of specifying
> grouping by the method other than by providing a function?

Actually there are no other methods.