[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:39:30 +0300 |
> From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
> Cc: 66125@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 13:30:36 +0200
>
> >> Hm, this creates an empty leim/small-ja-dic-option file after the first
> >> round of configure+make:
>
> > That's a one-time issue. I didn't think it was worth extra hassle to
> > avoid that. Do you see any problem with that?
>
> Not sure. Is it guaranteed that the empty file won't be included in the
> release tarball?
>
> > (The "if test" part of the new target's rules could be updated to
> > check that the small-ja-dic-option file exists, and generate a
> > non-empty file if not.)
>
> IMHO this would be cleaner.
Can you try that and see if there are no other issues?
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/24
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/24