[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 2023 13:30:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
>> Hm, this creates an empty leim/small-ja-dic-option file after the first
>> round of configure+make:
> That's a one-time issue. I didn't think it was worth extra hassle to
> avoid that. Do you see any problem with that?
Not sure. Is it guaranteed that the empty file won't be included in the
release tarball?
> (The "if test" part of the new target's rules could be updated to
> check that the small-ja-dic-option file exists, and generate a
> non-empty file if not.)
IMHO this would be cleaner.
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/20
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect,
Ulrich Mueller <=
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/23
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/09/24
- bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect, Ulrich Mueller, 2023/09/24