Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 08:47:02 +0200
From: Mattias Nyrell <mattias@nyrell.se>
Cc: 66141@debbugs.gnu.org
Yes, calling sleep-for is one way. I would also suggest to try
(sit-for 0)
If that works, it is faster.
Ok, thank you!
/Mattias
I tried (sit-for 0) and even (sit-for 5), but none of those worked.
(sleep-for 0.1) or (sleep-for 0) worked for me.
I guess this means that some input event from the window-system
interrupts sit-for too early, so sleep-for is really required.
I think we can now close this bug report, right?