bug#65882: 29.1; rcirc doesn't rejoin channels automatically on reconnecting

[Philip Kaludercic]

Manphiz <manphiz@gmail.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> The change makes sense, but I'll want to try it out to make sure we are
>> doing the right thing.  Unless I write something here, ping me in a few
>> days.  These kinds of auto-reconnect bugs can be annoying to debug in
>> real-life situations.
>>
>
> Friendly ping.

I haven't noticed any issues, and the change makes sense.  I'll apply it
to master.  Thanks!

>> Manphiz <manphiz@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> severity 65882 + minor
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> Manphiz <manphiz@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that you lowered the severity of this bug from "normal" to
>>>>> "wishlist".  AIUI rcirc provides a way to automatically join channels
>>>>> upon connecting to a server and currently this is not working as
>>>>> intended, so IMHO it should be considered a bug instead of a feature
>>>>> request (a wishlist).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, so I bumped it to minor.  I hope that makes more sense.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>>> (If you are using severity as a means to manage bug triage priority
>>>>> I'm OK with that.)
>>>>
>>>> My impression is that almost no one pays attention to bug severities, so
>>>> I wouldn't make too much of it.  Bug reports that come with a patch,
>>>> like yours did, tend to get more visibility though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah got it.  It's my first time filing bug here so not very familiar with
>>> the convention.  Looks like tagging patch was a good move :)
>>
>> So this patch would be applied without a copyright assignment, right?
>>
>>>>> Personally, as the patch is sufficiently trivial, I would hope it won't
>>>>> take too much work for a review.  But I would understand if dealing with
>>>>> rcirc-user-authenticated is more involved than it looks like and should
>>>>> be handled with care.
>>>>
>>>> I've copied in the rcirc maintainers.  Let's see if they have any
>>>> comments first.
>>>
>>> Great!  Thanks again!