bug#64459: 30.0.50; Edebug can't instrument certain syntax-propertize-rules forms

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: 64459@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:34:06 +0200
> 
> Am Mi., 5. Juli 2023 um 01:46 Uhr schrieb Stefan Monnier
> <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>:
> >
> > > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > > index d610fa005cc..002a24af18b 100644
> > > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > > @@ -249,11 +249,12 @@ syntax-propertize-rules
> > >  Note: There may be at most nine back-references in the REGEXPs of
> > >  all RULES in total."
> > >    (declare (debug (&rest &or symbolp    ;FIXME: edebug this eval step.
> > > -                         (form &rest
> > > -                               (numberp
> > > -                                [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
> > > -                                     ("prog1" [&or stringp def-form] 
> > > def-body)
> > > -                                     def-form])))))
> > > +                         (def-form
> > > +                          &rest
> > > +                          (numberp
> > > +                           [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
> > > +                                ("prog1" [&or stringp form] def-body)
> > > +                                form])))))
> > >    (let ((newrules nil))
> > >      (while rules
> > >        (if (symbolp (car rules))
> >
> > No, this one introduces a regression.  Try that one:
> >
> 
> Yeah, that works at least in the cases I've tested. Thanks!

Stefan, this is for master, right?