[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#64459: 30.0.50; Edebug can't instrument certain syntax-propertize-ru
From: |
Philipp Stephani |
Subject: |
bug#64459: 30.0.50; Edebug can't instrument certain syntax-propertize-rules forms |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jul 2023 11:34:06 +0200 |
Am Mi., 5. Juli 2023 um 01:46 Uhr schrieb Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>:
>
> > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > index d610fa005cc..002a24af18b 100644
> > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/syntax.el
> > @@ -249,11 +249,12 @@ syntax-propertize-rules
> > Note: There may be at most nine back-references in the REGEXPs of
> > all RULES in total."
> > (declare (debug (&rest &or symbolp ;FIXME: edebug this eval step.
> > - (form &rest
> > - (numberp
> > - [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
> > - ("prog1" [&or stringp def-form]
> > def-body)
> > - def-form])))))
> > + (def-form
> > + &rest
> > + (numberp
> > + [&or stringp ;FIXME: Use &wrap
> > + ("prog1" [&or stringp form] def-body)
> > + form])))))
> > (let ((newrules nil))
> > (while rules
> > (if (symbolp (car rules))
>
> No, this one introduces a regression. Try that one:
>
Yeah, that works at least in the cases I've tested. Thanks!