[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:36:06 +0200 |
close 56432 29.1
thanks
Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
> Lars> Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a wrapper
> Lars> around the "dig" program) and has worse output.
Thanks, now done (commit 707124d2b9).
> For extra credit, add a ʼserverʼ arg to a wrapper around `dns-query',
> and obsolete `dig' as well.
This part is left as an exercise for the reader. ;-)
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Robert Pluim, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?,
Stefan Kangas <=
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07