[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:24:55 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:56:55 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
>>>>> said:
Lars> Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>> Do we really need both the `dig' and the `run-dig' commands?
>>
>> Should one of them be obsoleted? If we want to be able to specify both
>> query-type and server, we could consider using double and triple
>> prefixes for that. Or even write a transient.
Lars> Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a wrapper
Lars> around the "dig" program) and has worse output.
For extra credit, add a ʼserverʼ arg to a wrapper around `dns-query',
and obsolete `dig' as well.
Robert
--
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07