|
From: | Konstantin Kharlamov |
Subject: | bug#35062: [PATCH v3 1/3] Remove redundant comparison |
Date: | Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:49:08 +0300 |
On Вс, Apr 14, 2019 at 23:38, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > "Suggested by" means you suggested a code> change, but I tweaked it enough to feel that you can no longer be held > responsible for whatever mistakes I might have made in the actual code> change I committed. I think you're saying that "suggested by" means that the code changes were suggested by that person -- not merely that the idea was suggested by per. Is that it?
That's what you quoted :)IMO in such situations (i.e. when original changes were commited without any modification anyway) would be nice to commit the original patch, and then add up further improvements as 2-nd commit. Ultimately what makes me sad is that if I'd want to refer to my commits in Emacs as part of a CV, it's hard to find all suggested-by and authored commits at the same time, and also that suggested-by sounds kind of vague to have an influence in CV.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |