[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32142: WG: 26.1; Problems with flyspell-region
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#32142: WG: 26.1; Problems with flyspell-region |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 18:44:00 +0300 |
> From: "R. Diez" <rdiezmail-emacs@yahoo.de>
> Cc: 32142@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 17:15:12 +0200
>
> > I object to the "unable or unwilling" part of your complaint.
> > I was just stating the fact that the feature you expected was > missing
> > from Emacs, because no one designed and coded it.
>
> My "complaining" and your "stating of the fact" are both subjective
> perceptions.
No, a fact is not a subjective thing.
> My point of view is as follows: I took several e-mails to fix (if only
> in the documentation) an obvious issue I had reported correctly and I
> had to insist. Your answers were selective, side-stepping the problem.
> Your tend to answer in an authoritative way, kind of supporting or
> defending the current implementation, or negating the existence of a
> problem. It is a frustrating exercise. This is not the first time that
> this kind of "resistance" happens to me with open source projects, or
> with the Emacs developers. It is in fact a recurring pattern.
What you perceive is "selective", "side-stepping", "authoritative",
and "defensive" responses were just my attempts at understanding the
issues in full, that's all.
> I guess we could start a new bug about ispell, couldn't we?
You could, yes.