[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:34:23 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: 19368@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:46:13 +1100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > I don't think you should be bothered by that, because 'underline' is a
> > standard face, and every terminal expresses it as best as they can.
> > Just use it.
>
> But underline in addition to [t]his?
>
> I guess I'm asking whether there are terminals that don't do underline
> at all, and I would guess that there are... so we need to do [t]his on
> all terminals, unless we have a way to query the terminal for whether it
> supports underline?
I think you want this:
(display-supports-face-attributes-p '(:underline t) FRAME)
This returns non-nil only if underline is supported "in some way" by
FRAME's display. Where "in some way" means that the appearance will
be different from the default face.
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/04
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/04