[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:46:13 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> I don't think you should be bothered by that, because 'underline' is a
> standard face, and every terminal expresses it as best as they can.
> Just use it.
But underline in addition to [t]his?
I guess I'm asking whether there are terminals that don't do underline
at all, and I would guess that there are... so we need to do [t]his on
all terminals, unless we have a way to query the terminal for whether it
supports underline?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/04
bug#19368: 25.0.50; NSM prompt is not self-explanatory enough, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/04