[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:41:38 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Sure, but if a user asks Calc to work with m/m, the classic Calc
> behavior was for Calc to ask for a new unit, then basically ignore it
> and cancel the units. If the user put in "3 m/m", "New units: rad", the
> result would not be "3", not "3 rad". (Behind the scenes the new unit
> would be introduced but then disappear.)
This behavior was inconsistent, by the way.
That might be related to a simplification bug I mentioned earlier in
this thread; I'll look into that.
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, (continued)
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units,
Jay Belanger <=
- Message not available
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/07
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/02/08