[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units
From: |
Roland Winkler |
Subject: |
bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:19:04 -0600 |
On Thu Feb 7 2013 Jay Belanger wrote:
>
> >> > Please recognize the difference between dimensionless and unitless.
> >> > 3 ft/in is dimensionless, but it has the unit "ft/in".
> >>
> >> "The expression is unitless when simplified"
> >
> > I am sorry, this is a rather unique interpretation of the concept of
> > "dimensions" vs "units" in physics.
>
> I honestly have no idea what you are talking about, but you
> certainly aren't addressing what I am saying. Please respond to
> what I write. I've been consistently talking about units, not
> dimensions; I have given no interpretation of "dimensions" vs
> "units". The expression above has no units when simplified; that's
> a pretty straightforward statement.
I give up
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, (continued)
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/08
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Roland Winkler, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/09
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Jay Belanger, 2013/02/08
- Message not available
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units,
Roland Winkler <=
- bug#13580: 24.2.92; regression in calc-convert-units, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/02/08