[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2011 18:27:44 +0200 |
> From: Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 16:50:33 +0100
> Cc: kbrown@cornell.edu,
> 9943@debbugs.gnu.org
>
>
> >> In x-create-frame terminal->reference_count gets incremented before
> >> record_unwind_protect, but it is not decremented in case the unwind
> >> protect function is called.
> >
> > Isn't it safer (from the POV of potentially destabilizing Emacs during
> > a pretest) to leave the increment where it was, and decrement it in the
> > unwind protect function?
> >
>
> Maybe, but I rather leave it as is, so it mirrors the
> dpyinfo->reference_count usage.
<Shrug> OK, I made w32fns.c do the same.
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, martin rudalics, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Ken Brown, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Jan Djärv, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Jan Djärv, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/07
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/04
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/04