[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory
From: |
Jan Djärv |
Subject: |
bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Nov 2011 16:50:33 +0100 |
5 nov 2011 kl. 14:18 skrev Eli Zaretskii:
>> From: Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
>> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 13:26:08 +0100
>> Cc: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>,
>> 9943@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>
>> In x-create-frame terminal->reference_count gets incremented before
>> record_unwind_protect, but it is not decremented in case the unwind protect
>> function is called.
>
> Isn't it safer (from the POV of potentially destabilizing Emacs during
> a pretest) to leave the increment where it was, and decrement it in the
> unwind protect function?
>
Maybe, but I rather leave it as is, so it mirrors the dpyinfo->reference_count
usage.
Jan D.
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, martin rudalics, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Ken Brown, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Jan Djärv, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory,
Jan Djärv <=
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/05
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/07
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Stefan Monnier, 2011/11/03
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/11/04
- bug#9943: 24.0.91; Abort in check_glyph_memory, Glenn Morris, 2011/11/04