Re: wget2 | Building on Windows (#567)

[Michael Setzer II (@msetzerii)]

Michael Setzer II commented:


Don't think that is a real valid comparison? The issue of wget2 is mostly the 
treading, and downloading a single file would make no use of that, so would 
expect the extra overhead to perhaps take longer.
I have been using it to download a campus directory of a local university. It 
is currently spread across 64 web pages that total about 14M in size. This is 
using the linux version from my Fedora 34 notebook
$ time wget2 --max-threads=70 --secure-protocol=PFS -q 
--base="https://www.uog.edu/directory/"; -i testlistuog 
real    0m10.515s
user    0m1.308s
sys     0m0.276s
[msetzerii@setzconote uog]$ time wget --secure-protocol=PFS -q 
--base="https://www.uog.edu/directory/"; -i testlistuog 
real    0m46.958s
user    0m0.271s
sys     0m0.174s
 Also, do same for my old community college, but it is much smaller data set.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.com/gnuwget/wget2/-/issues/567#note_819479345
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.com.