[Rpm2html] Re: A few of minor issues with rpm2html

[Peter Hanecak]

Hello,

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Aleksey Nogin wrote:

> Daniel Veillard tells me that you are now going to be a maintainer of 
> rpm2html. How do you want to receive bug reports - bugzilla somewhere, or by 
> email?
>
> Anyway, there are tree issues with the rpm2html 1.8.2 that I wanted to 
> communicate:
>
> - It calls itself 1.8.1 instead of 1.8.2 - see 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113750
>
> - The limit on the length of version and release "numbers" is too low - see 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113753
>
> - rpm2html segfaults on 8.0 (with rpm 4.1.1. from Fedora Legacy) when it is 
> compiled certain way (e.g. changes to the default spec file are required to 
> solve these prolems) - see https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=38
>
> And thank you for taking on the maintainership!

well, I am maintainig it (at least I still think I am while I'm using it 
and making some patches :) but you see: not very quickly. :/

Please, if it is not alredy too late, test release 1.9.1 (see 
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/rpm2html/) and tell me what's left to 
fix. IMO the issue #1 you reported is fixed. Issue #2 should be fixed and 
issue #3 ... as I look at Bugzilla entry, it should be fixed (i.e. 
rpm2html works with newer RPM libraries).

Thank you in advance.

Sincerely

Peter

--
===================================================================
  Peter Hanecak <address@hidden>
  GPG pub.key: http://www.megaloman.com/gpg/hanecak-megaloman.txt
===================================================================