[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ranger-users] ranger infrastructure
From: |
Roman Z. |
Subject: |
Re: [Ranger-users] ranger infrastructure |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2013 03:17:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi again.
This is a test run for the Q&A system:
http://hut.lepus.uberspace.de/qa/
Possibly it will replace ranger's bug trackers and remove the need for a
forum.
Feel free to try it out and suggest modifications. Also, I don't mind
if you break it, so try out whatever you want.
Regards,
Roman
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:56:07PM +0200, Roman Z. wrote:
> Hello ranger users,
>
> Instead of just talking about the idea of a forum, let's talk about the
> infrastructure in general. The network of services that are related to
> ranger in some way is:
>
> ranger
> |-- Savannah: https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/ranger
> | |-- Homepage: http://www.nongnu.org/ranger/
> | |-- News: https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=ranger
> | |-- Issue Tracker: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=ranger
> | |-- git: https://savannah.nongnu.org/git/?group=ranger
> | '-- Mailing list: https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ranger-users
> |
> |-- Arch Linux:
> | |-- Forum Thread: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=93025
> | '-- Wiki Page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ranger
> |
> |-- GitHub:
> | |-- git: https://github.com/hut/ranger
> | '-- Issue Tracker: https://github.com/hut/ranger/issues
> |
> |-- repo.or.cz:
> | '-- git: http://repo.or.cz/w/ranger.git
> |
> '-- Various package maintainers
>
>
> My questions:
>
> 1. Move to redmine [1]? Most of the above can be replaced by it.
> 2. Can a Q/A system like [2] or [3] do the job of a bug tracker?
> Often, questions about the software are actually bug reports.
> Why not merge both systems into one?
> 3. What would be a good system for publishing plugins and patches?
> 4. What else sucks?
>
> My current plan would be to simply install a Q/A system like [2] or [3].
> If it works nicely, we can close the two bug trackers and the arch linux
> forum thread and use the Q/A system instead. The Arch Linux wiki page
> would stay and GitHub would only serve as a redundant git host.
>
>
> Roman
>
> [1] http://www.redmine.org/
> [2] http://www.osqa.net/
> [3] http://www.question2answer.org/
>
>
- Re: [Ranger-users] ranger infrastructure,
Roman Z. <=