qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/22] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate)


From: Jinjie Ruan
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/22] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:34:56 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.0


On 2024/2/22 3:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2/21/24 03:08, Jinjie Ruan via wrote:
>> Add ALLINT MSR (immediate) to decodetree. And the EL0 check is necessary
>> to ALLINT. Avoid the unconditional write to pc and use raise_exception_ra
>> to unwind.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   target/arm/tcg/a64.decode      |  1 +
>>   target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c    | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h    |  1 +
>>   target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
>> index 8a20dce3c8..3588080024 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
>> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
>> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ MSR_i_DIT       1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 010
>> 11111 @msr_i
>>   MSR_i_TCO       1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 100 11111 @msr_i
>>   MSR_i_DAIFSET   1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 110 11111 @msr_i
>>   MSR_i_DAIFCLEAR 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 111 11111 @msr_i
>> +MSR_i_ALLINT    1101 0101 0000 0 001 0100 .... 000 11111 @msr_i
>>   MSR_i_SVCR      1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 0 mask:2 imm:1 011 11111
>>     # MRS, MSR (register), SYS, SYSL. These are all essentially the
>> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
>> index ebaa7f00df..3686926ada 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
>> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,30 @@ void HELPER(msr_i_spsel)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t
>> imm)
>>       update_spsel(env, imm);
>>   }
>>   +static void allint_check(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t op,
>> +                       uint32_t imm, uintptr_t ra)
>> +{
>> +    /* ALLINT update to PSTATE. */
>> +    if (arm_current_el(env) == 0) {
>> +        raise_exception_ra(env, EXCP_UDEF,
>> +                           syn_aa64_sysregtrap(0, extract32(op, 0, 3),
>> +                                               extract32(op, 3, 3), 4,
>> +                                               imm, 0x1f, 0),
>> +                           exception_target_el(env), ra);
>> +    }
>> +}
> 
> A runtime check for EL0 is not necessary; you've already handled that in
> trans_MSR_i_ALLINT().  However, what *is* missing here is the test
> against TALLINT for EL1.

Thank you! I'll fix it.

> 
>> +
>> +void HELPER(msr_i_allint)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t imm)
>> +{
>> +    allint_check(env, 0x8, imm, GETPC());
>> +    if (imm == 1) {
>> +        env->allint |= PSTATE_ALLINT;
>> +    } else {
>> +        env->allint &= ~PSTATE_ALLINT;
>> +    }
> 
> I think you should not write an immediate-specific helper, but one which
> can also handle the variable "MSR allint, <xt>".  This is no more
> difficult than

The kernel patches now uses the immediate-specific helper only, so it is
necessary for test.

> 
> void HELPER(msr_allint)(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong val)
> {
>     ... check ...
>     env->pstate = (env->pstate & ~PSTATE_ALLINT) | (val & PSTATE_ALLINT);
> }
> 
>> +    arm_rebuild_hflags(env);
>> +}
> 
> allint does not affect hflags; no rebuild required.

Thank you! I'll fix it.

> 
>> +static bool trans_MSR_i_ALLINT(DisasContext *s, arg_i *a)
>> +{
>> +    if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, s) || s->current_el == 0) {
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +    gen_helper_msr_i_allint(tcg_env, tcg_constant_i32(a->imm));
> 
> You're passing all of #imm4, not #imm1, which meant the test in your
> msr_i_allint helper was wrong.

In fact, it's either 0 or 1 for CRm according to the arm manual, so it
is not necessary.

> 
> To work with the generalized helper above, this would be
> 
>     tcg_constant_tl((a->imm & 1) * PSTATE_ALLINT);
> 
> 
> r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]