qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] linux-user/aarch64: Extend PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL fo


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] linux-user/aarch64: Extend PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL for FEAT_MTE3
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:31:42 +1000
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 2/7/24 00:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 03:06, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:

When MTE3 is supported, the kernel maps
   PR_MTE_TCF_ASYNC | PR_MTE_TCF_SYNC
to
   MTE_CTRL_TCF_ASYMM
and from there to
   SCTLR_EL1.TCF0 = 3

This depends on the setting of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu<N>/mte_tcf_preferred :
I think you only get asymm here if the sysadmin has set
mte_tcf_preferred to 'asymm'; the default is 'async'.

Hmm, I missed that somewhere in the rat's nest.
I suspect this is over-engineered, such that no one will understand how to use 
it.

For QEMU's implementation, are there any particular
performance differences between sync, async and asymm ?

I doubt it.  Getting to the error path at all is the bulk of the work.

I think "performance" in this case would be highly test-case-centric.
Does the test "perform better" with async, which would allow the entire vector operation to finish in one go?

I suspect that for debugging purposes, sync is always preferred.
That might be the best setting for qemu.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]