Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c: Include the full helpers only with CONFIG_ARM_V7M

[Peter Maydell]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 08:18, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_ARM_V7M is not set, we don't want to include the full-fledged
> helper functions that require additional functions for linking. The
> reduced set of the linux-user functions works fine as stubs in this
> case, so change the #ifdef statement accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c b/target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c
> index d1f1e02acc..a5a6e96fc3 100644
> --- a/target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/tcg/m_helper.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #endif
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>  #include "hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.h"
> +#include CONFIG_DEVICES
>  #endif
>
>  static void v7m_msr_xpsr(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t mask,
> @@ -69,7 +70,7 @@ uint32_t arm_v7m_mrs_control(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t 
> secure)
>      return value;
>  }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) || !defined(CONFIG_ARM_V7M)

This looks a bit odd. If we don't have CONFIG_ARM_V7M
why are we compiling this file at all?

>
>  void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, uint32_t val)
>  {

thanks
-- PMM