qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] pc-bios/optionrom: Add -fno-stack-protector


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pc-bios/optionrom: Add -fno-stack-protector
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 09:46:35 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0

On 31/07/2023 08.58, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
A build of GCC 13.2 will have stack protector enabled by default if it
was configured with --enable-default-ssp option. For such a compiler,
it is necessary to explicitly disable stack protector when linking
without standard libraries.

Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
---
  pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile | 2 +-
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile  | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
index b1fff0ba6c..f220d81f2c 100644
--- a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
+++ b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ quiet-command = $(call quiet-@,$2 $@)$1
  override CPPFLAGS += -MMD -MP -MT $@ -MF $(@D)/$(*F).d
override CFLAGS += -march=i486 -Wall $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -m16
-override CFLAGS += -ffreestanding -I$(TOPSRC_DIR)/include
+override CFLAGS += -ffreestanding -fno-stack-protector -I$(TOPSRC_DIR)/include
cc-test = $(CC) -Werror $1 -c -o /dev/null -xc /dev/null >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
  cc-option = if $(call cc-test, $1); then \
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile
index acfcd1e71a..446d448913 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/Makefile
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ OBJECTS = start.o main.o bootmap.o jump2ipl.o sclp.o menu.o \
  EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Wall
  EXTRA_CFLAGS += -ffreestanding -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-common 
-fPIE
  EXTRA_CFLAGS += -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
-EXTRA_CFLAGS += -msoft-float
+EXTRA_CFLAGS += -fno-stack-protector -msoft-float
  EXTRA_CFLAGS += -std=gnu99
  LDFLAGS += -Wl,-pie -nostdlib

Both Makefiles seem to add -no-stack-protector in other lines already, so this patch does not seem to be necessary?

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]