[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 5/6] qtest: irq_intercept_[out/in]: return FAIL if no interce
|
From: |
Chris Laplante |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 5/6] qtest: irq_intercept_[out/in]: return FAIL if no intercepts are installed |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:03:21 +0000 |
> Makes sense. Did you do a 'make check' on an
> all-targets-enabled build just to confirm we haven't
> accidentally let any bogus uses of the command in while
> it was returning OK for these cases?
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell peter.maydell@linaro.org
Yes, I just did a 'make check' and got:
Ok: 737
Expected Fail: 0
Fail: 0
Unexpected Pass: 0
Skipped: 71
Timeout: 0
Thanks,
Chris
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] hw/gpio/nrf51: implement DETECT signal, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/6] qtest: implement named interception of out-GPIO, Chris Laplante, 2023/07/14
- [PATCH 3/6] qtest: bail from irq_intercept_in if name is specified, Chris Laplante, 2023/07/14
- [PATCH 4/6] qtest: factor out qtest_install_gpio_out_intercepts, Chris Laplante, 2023/07/14
- [PATCH 6/6] qtest: microbit-test: add tests for nRF51 DETECT, Chris Laplante, 2023/07/14
- [PATCH 5/6] qtest: irq_intercept_[out/in]: return FAIL if no intercepts are installed, Chris Laplante, 2023/07/14
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add nRF51 DETECT signal with test, Peter Maydell, 2023/07/24