[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector
From: |
Clemens Kirchgatterer |
Subject: |
Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 21:46:22 +0100 |
Teunis Peters <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Well. Don't know how to handle this. I'm sure (?) there are some
> > > people interested in the fileselector but it shouldn't bloat the
> > > lib(i guess).
> > >
> > > Maybe we can get some suggestions how to handle this the right
> > > way.
> >
> > put it in main source tree and allow to disable/enable them at
> > compile time (./configure --enable-extra-widgets) or something like
> > that.
>
> secondary source tree within main source tree, constructs seperate
> lib. Source bloat shouldn't bother people too much... after all,
> 150+megs to compile the -current- code won't change THAT much *wry
> grin*
>
> I like the idea of an optional -lpgutils or -lpgcomctl or something.
but t least it schould get distributed within the main sourcetree. no
seperate downloads, please!
- [paragui-users] pg_fileselector, Keith Swyer, 2002/11/01
- [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Michael Bartl, 2002/11/22
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Alexander Pipelka, 2002/11/22
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Michael Bartl, 2002/11/22
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Alexander Pipelka, 2002/11/23
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Michael Bartl, 2002/11/24
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Alexander Pipelka, 2002/11/29
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Clemens Kirchgatterer, 2002/11/29
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector, Teunis Peters, 2002/11/29
- Re: [paragui-users] PG_FileSelector,
Clemens Kirchgatterer <=